With a court ruling back in 2011 Social Security & Medicare have become interlocked.
In March of 2011 federal Judge, Rosemary Collyer ruled that in order to receive Social Security a person would also have to enroll in Medicare, if the person refused Medicare for any reason then they would have to forfeit all Social Security benefits too.
This case was under appeal by the Cato Institute a right leaning organization on behalf of three Federal Employee Retirees who not only didn’t want Medicare coverage but actually didn’t need it because of the benefits they were receiving in retirement (the case eventually added two others as well who were not Fed Employee Retirees)
Well, earlier this year the ruling was upheld in a court of law, on Feb. 7, 2012, a federal appeals court ruled in Brian Hall, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al. that senior citizens who receive Social Security cannot reject their legal rights to Medicare benefits.
This ruling has now single handedly created the one expense that every single retiree will face – Medicare.
And guess what?
Medicare is not free.





Market Commentary – Long-term Care
I recently served as a panelist, along with Dr. Katy Votava, President of Goodcare.com, and Thomas West, ChFC, of Signature Estate & Investment Advisors, for a webcast sponsored by Investment News entitled, “Women in Retirement: Managing Longevity.” With over 1,200 financial advisors registering to be in attendance, moderators Frederick Gabriel and Mary Beth Franklin attempted to shed light on a growing financial problem among Baby Boomers: most women retiring today are projected to outlive their savings.
As the founder of HVS Financial, I have been proselytizing for years about the financial dangers related to long-term care costs in retirement. Women are especially vulnerable financially because they have longer life expectancies than men and are often left without enough savings after their spouses pass on. Here are some important facts:
The aforementioned statistics are not the total story. Let’s say this 58-year-old woman is happily married to her husband of the same age. More than likely, she will live approximately five years longer. Here are some other projections:
According to Medicare, by 2020, between 12 and 14 million people are going to need some form of long-term care. That means roughly 1 in 6 Boomers—or more importantly, one third of all couples—will require some level of LTC—enough to cripple a family’s life savings.
A common reaction is to assume that Medicaid is the solution. Think twice before depending on Medicaid, as benefits will likely be cut to help address the country’s deficit problems, and for the most part, current Medicaid benefits do not cover facilities with any real amenities. The key is to have assets available to cover the cost of at least a one-year stay.
On a personal note, since I am considerably older than my lovely wife Marea, I should probably keep these statistics and all sharp objects away from her (only kidding). I am sure that she would not look forward to the possibility that keeping me alive in a nursing home might one day put her in the poorhouse. Let’s face facts: LTC almost exclusively occurs during the final years of life, when loved ones are hooked up to a myriad of tubes and bags and often cannot perform the most basic daily functions. I am sure that my wife cares about me very much and would do anything for me. But, writing a check for $500,000 a year just to keep me propped on some pillows is difficult for me to swallow. What if it goes on for two years? Three?
Fortunately, financial industry professionals are prepared to address this issue, and the time to act is now. Potential solutions to catastrophic long-term care costs include purchasing LTC insurance, looking into annuity products that offer long-term care riders, carving a portion of savings that can be allocated to LTC costs, and/or purchasing a universal life policy that offers LTC or catastrophic care riders (an additional benefit is related to the favorable tax status built into life policies). Since the average Baby Boomer is looking at an investment period of 20 to 30 years, it is worth talking to an advisor about considering a more aggressive portfolio dedicated to LTC savings. If investors do not require LTC services, the accrued assets can be left to heirs.
Think about it: tackling this problem today could be the ultimate holiday gift for your spouse and children.
Happy Holidays!
The next Update will be posted on January 7, 2013.
The Update is written by Chris Leone and Ron Mastrogiovanni.